Craving Meaning In Hindi
Craving Meaning In Hindi. |1978 || तृष्णा || डॉक्टर सुनील गुप्ता ||। अर्थात, हमने भोग नहीं भुगते, बल्कि भोगों ने ही हमें भुगता है; Craving शब्द के हिंदी अर्थ का उदाहरण:
The relationship between a sign along with the significance of the sign can be called"the theory that explains meaning.. We will discuss this in the following article. we will be discussing the problems with truth conditional theories of meaning, Grice's theory of speaker-meaning, as well as the semantic theories of Tarski. The article will also explore some arguments against Tarski's theory regarding truth.
Arguments against truth-conditional theories of meaning
Truth-conditional theories of meaning claim that meaning is a function of the conditions that determine truth. However, this theory limits the meaning of linguistic phenomena to. The argument of Davidson essentially states that truth-values are not always reliable. So, it is essential to be able distinguish between truth and flat statement.
The Epistemic Determination Argument is a method to establish truth-conditional theories for meaning. It relies on two key beliefs: omniscience of nonlinguistic facts as well as knowing the truth-condition. But Daniel Cohnitz has argued against these assumptions. This argument therefore is unfounded.
Another major concern associated with these theories is the impossibility of meaning. But this is addressed through mentalist analysis. In this way, meaning is examined in terms of a mental representation, rather than the intended meaning. For instance there are people who have different meanings for the similar word when that same user uses the same word in various contexts, yet the meanings associated with those words could be similar if the speaker is using the same word in at least two contexts.
Although the majority of theories of definition attempt to explain how meaning is constructed in way of mental material, non-mentalist theories are often pursued. This could be because of skepticism of mentalist theories. They are also favored with the view mental representation should be analyzed in terms of the representation of language.
Another major defender of this position I would like to mention Robert Brandom. This philosopher believes that meaning of a sentence dependent on its social setting and that speech actions in relation to a sentence are appropriate in its context in the context in which they are utilized. This is why he developed a pragmatics model to explain the meaning of sentences using socio-cultural norms and normative positions.
There are issues with Grice's interpretation of speaker-meaning
Grice's analysis to understand speaker-meaning places large emphasis on the speaker's intent and their relationship to the significance of the sentence. Grice believes that intention is something that is a complicated mental state which must be understood in order to grasp the meaning of an utterance. However, this interpretation is contrary to the principle of speaker centrism, which is to analyze U-meaning without considering M-intentions. Furthermore, Grice fails to account for the fact that M-intentions don't have to be only limited to two or one.
Further, Grice's study does not account for certain important instances of intuitive communications. For example, in the photograph example previously mentioned, the speaker does not clarify whether it was Bob himself or his wife. This is a problem since Andy's photo does not reveal whether Bob as well as his spouse is unfaithful , or loyal.
Although Grice is right the speaker's meaning is more fundamental than sentence-meanings, there is some debate to be had. The distinction is essential for an understanding of the naturalistic validity of the non-natural meaning. In reality, the aim of Grice is to give an explanation that is naturalistic for this non-natural meaning.
To comprehend the nature of a conversation, we must understand an individual's motives, and that's an intricate embedding and beliefs. Yet, we rarely make intricate inferences about mental states in normal communication. Therefore, Grice's model of speaker-meaning does not align with the actual cognitive processes involved in the comprehension of language.
While Grice's description of speaker-meaning is a plausible description about the processing, it's insufficient. Others, including Bennett, Loar, and Schiffer, have created deeper explanations. These explanations, however, tend to diminish the plausibility of the Gricean theory since they treat communication as an activity that is rational. In essence, audiences are conditioned to be convinced that the speaker's message is true because they perceive their speaker's motivations.
Additionally, it does not make a case for all kinds of speech actions. Grice's model also fails account for the fact that speech is often used to explain the significance of sentences. This means that the meaning of a sentence is limited to its meaning by its speaker.
Issues with Tarski's semantic theory of truth
While Tarski declared that sentences are truth-bearing however, this doesn't mean sentences must be true. Instead, he sought to define what constitutes "true" in a specific context. The theory is now the basis of modern logic and is classified as a deflationary theory or correspondence theory.
One drawback with the theory for truth is it is unable to be applied to any natural language. This issue is caused by Tarski's undefinability concept, which affirms that no bilingual language could contain its own predicate. Even though English may seem to be one exception to this law but it's not in conflict with Tarski's belief that natural languages are closed semantically.
But, Tarski leaves many implicit restrictions on his theories. For example, a theory must not include false sentences or instances of the form T. This means that any theory should be able to overcome what is known as the Liar paradox. Another issue with Tarski's doctrine is that it's not in line with the work of traditional philosophers. Furthermore, it's unable to describe the truth of every situation in traditional sense. This is the biggest problem in any theory of truth.
Another issue is that Tarski's definitions for truth requires the use of notions in set theory and syntax. These are not the best choices when looking at infinite languages. Henkin's style in language is well-founded, however it does not support Tarski's definition of truth.
Truth as defined by Tarski is insufficient because it fails to provide a comprehensive explanation for the truth. For instance, truth does not play the role of an axiom in an analysis of meaning, and Tarski's definition of truth cannot explain the nature of primitives. Furthermore, his definitions of truth is not consistent with the notion of truth in interpretation theories.
These issues, however, will not prevent Tarski from using their definition of truth and it is not a have to be classified as a satisfaction definition. In fact, the proper definition of truth isn't as simple and is based on the peculiarities of language objects. If you'd like to know more, take a look at Thoralf Skolem's 1919 paper.
Problems with Grice's analysis of sentence-meaning
The difficulties in Grice's study of sentence meanings can be summed up in two main points. First, the intention of the speaker needs to be recognized. Also, the speaker's declaration must be accompanied by evidence that demonstrates the intended outcome. However, these requirements aren't observed in all cases.
This issue can be resolved by changing Grice's analysis of sentence-meaning to include the meaning of sentences that are not based on intentionality. This analysis is also based on the notion that sentences are highly complex and include a range of elements. As such, the Gricean analysis isn't able to identify examples that are counterexamples.
This argument is especially problematic with regard to Grice's distinctions between speaker-meaning and sentence-meaning. This distinction is crucial to any naturalistically respectable account of sentence-meaning. This theory is also important in the theory of conversational implicature. For the 1957 year, Grice provided a basic theory of meaning, which was further developed in later studies. The basic idea of significance in Grice's study is to think about the speaker's intentions in determining what message the speaker wants to convey.
Another problem with Grice's study is that it fails to consider intuitive communication. For example, in Grice's example, it's not clear what Andy means by saying that Bob is unfaithful for his wife. But, there are numerous alternatives to intuitive communication examples that do not fit into Grice's theory.
The fundamental claim of Grice's argument is that the speaker must aim to provoke an effect in an audience. This isn't philosophically rigorous. Grice adjusts the cutoff by relying on potential cognitive capacities of the speaker and the nature communication.
Grice's understanding of sentence-meaning is not very plausible even though it's a plausible interpretation. Some researchers have offered better explanations for meaning, but they're less plausible. Additionally, Grice views communication as an activity that is rational. People reason about their beliefs by being aware of the speaker's intent.
Know craving meaning in hindi and translation in hindi. Definitions and meaning of craving in english, translation of craving in english language with similar and opposite words. What's the hindi word for craving?
तृष्णा | Learn Detailed Meaning Of Craving In Hindi Dictionary With Audio Prononciations, Definitions And Usage.
This page also provides synonyms and grammar. Know a craving meaning in hindi and translation in hindi. Along with the hindi meaning of craving, multiple definitions are also stated to provide a complete meaning of.
Know Craving Meaning In Hindi And Translation In Hindi.
Translation in hindi for craving with similar and opposite words. Craving meaning in hindi | craving ka matlab kya hota hai हर रोज़ इस्तेमाल होने वाले 11000+ english words को आसानी से सीखने. Looking for the meaning of craving in hindi?
Look Through Examples Of Craving Translation In Sentences, Listen To Pronunciation And Learn Grammar.
Craving is a noun according to parts of speech. Here's a list of translations. Spoken pronunciation of craving in.
More Hindi Words For Craving.
The correct meaning of craving in hindi is उत्कट इच्छा. Craving definition, pronuniation, antonyms, synonyms and example sentences in hindi. Know the meaning of the cravin word in hindi with this amazing online english to hindi dictionary.
Craving शब्द के हिंदी अर्थ का उदाहरण:
A strong feeling of wanting something: A craving word meaning with their sentences, usage, synonyms, antonyms, narrower meaning and related word meaning. A strong feeling of wanting something:
Post a Comment for "Craving Meaning In Hindi"