Meaning Of Condemnation In Hindi
Meaning Of Condemnation In Hindi. The correct meaning of condemnation in hindi is निंदा. There are always several meanings of each word in hindi.
The relation between a sign and the meaning of its sign is called"the theory on meaning. It is in this essay that we'll examine the issues with truth-conditional theories of meaning, Grice's examination of the meaning of the speaker and The semantics of Truth proposed by Tarski. We will also analyze some arguments against Tarski's theory regarding truth.
Arguments against the truth-based theories of meaning
Truth-conditional theories on meaning state that meaning is a function on the truthful conditions. This theory, however, limits meaning to the linguistic phenomena. This argument is essentially that truth-values might not be valid. In other words, we have to know the difference between truth-values as opposed to a flat claim.
The Epistemic Determination Argument is an attempt to provide evidence for truth-conditional theories regarding meaning. It relies on two essential beliefs: omniscience of nonlinguistic facts and knowing the truth-condition. But Daniel Cohnitz has argued against these assumptions. Therefore, this argument does not have any merit.
Another major concern associated with these theories is the impossibility of the concept of. However, this worry is resolved by the method of mentalist analysis. In this way, meaning is analyzed in regards to a representation of the mental, rather than the intended meaning. For instance an individual can have different meanings for the one word when the person is using the same words in two different contexts, yet the meanings associated with those words could be identical as long as the person uses the same word in various contexts.
The majority of the theories of significance attempt to explain the meaning in relation to the content of mind, other theories are sometimes pursued. This could be because of being skeptical of theories of mentalists. They may also be pursued by those who believe that mental representation should be considered in terms of linguistic representation.
Another important advocate for this view one of them is Robert Brandom. This philosopher believes that meaning of a sentence dependent on its social and cultural context and that speech activities that involve a sentence are appropriate in what context in which they're used. So, he's come up with an argumentation theory of pragmatics that can explain the meaning of sentences using the normative social practice and normative status.
Grice's analysis of speaker-meaning
The analysis of speaker-meaning by Grice places an emphasis on the speaker's intentions and their relation to the significance that the word conveys. He asserts that intention can be an abstract mental state which must be understood in an attempt to interpret the meaning of an utterance. But, this method of analysis is in violation of speaker centrism because it examines U meaning without considering M-intentions. In addition, Grice fails to account for the possibility that M-intentions do not have to be only limited to two or one.
Further, Grice's study doesn't account for essential instances of intuition-based communication. For instance, in the photograph example in the previous paragraph, the speaker does not specify whether the message was directed at Bob and his wife. This is problematic because Andy's photo doesn't reveal whether Bob or wife is unfaithful , or faithful.
While Grice is correct that speaker-meaning has more significance than sentence-meaning, there is still room for debate. In fact, the distinction is essential for the naturalistic credibility of non-natural meaning. Indeed, Grice's aim is to give naturalistic explanations for this kind of non-natural meaning.
To comprehend a communication we must be aware of the meaning of the speaker and that intention is an intricate embedding and beliefs. Yet, we do not make complex inferences about mental states in everyday conversations. Therefore, Grice's interpretation of speaker-meaning isn't compatible to the actual psychological processes that are involved in language understanding.
While Grice's description of speaker-meaning is a plausible explanation about the processing, it is still far from comprehensive. Others, like Bennett, Loar, and Schiffer have come up with more elaborate explanations. These explanations can reduce the validity of Gricean theory, since they view communication as an activity rational. The reason audiences trust what a speaker has to say due to the fact that they understand the speaker's intention.
In addition, it fails to take into account all kinds of speech actions. Grice's approach fails to acknowledge the fact that speech is often used to explain the meaning of sentences. The result is that the meaning of a sentence is reduced to the speaker's interpretation.
Problems with Tarski's semantic theories of truth
Although Tarski believed that sentences are truth-bearing However, this doesn't mean sentences must be true. Instead, he sought to define what is "true" in a specific context. His theory has become a central part of modern logic and is classified as a deflationary theory, also known as correspondence theory.
The problem with the concept to be true is that the concept cannot be applied to natural languages. This is because of Tarski's undefinabilitytheorem, which states that no bivalent language can be able to contain its own predicate. While English might appear to be an the exception to this rule but it does not go along the view of Tarski that natural languages are closed semantically.
However, Tarski leaves many implicit constraints on his theory. For example the theory cannot contain false statements or instances of form T. In other words, theories must not be able to avoid it being subject to the Liar paradox. Another issue with Tarski's idea is that it's not consistent with the work of traditional philosophers. In addition, it's impossible to explain the truth of every situation in terms of ordinary sense. This is one of the major problems for any theory of truth.
The second issue is that Tarski's definitions requires the use of notions that come from set theory and syntax. These are not appropriate in the context of infinite languages. Henkin's style for language is well established, however it doesn't support Tarski's notion of truth.
It is also problematic because it does not account for the complexity of the truth. In particular, truth is not able to be a predicate in the context of an interpretation theory as Tarski's axioms don't help explain the nature of primitives. Further, his definition of truth isn't in accordance with the notion of truth in interpretation theories.
However, these difficulties do not preclude Tarski from applying Tarski's definition of what is truth and it is not a qualify as satisfying. The actual definition of truth is less straightforward and depends on the particularities of object language. If your interest is to learn more about it, read Thoralf's 1919 work.
Problems with Grice's understanding of sentence-meaning
The issues with Grice's method of analysis of sentence meanings can be summed up in two principal points. First, the intention of the speaker has to be understood. Also, the speaker's declaration must be supported by evidence that demonstrates the intended outcome. However, these conditions aren't being met in all cases.
This issue can be addressed by altering Grice's interpretation of phrase-based meaning, which includes the significance of sentences that do not exhibit intentionality. This analysis also rests upon the assumption that sentences are highly complex and have several basic elements. In this way, the Gricean analysis fails to recognize the counterexamples.
This argument is particularly problematic in light of Grice's distinction between meaning of the speaker and sentence. This distinction is crucial to any naturalistically based account of sentence-meaning. This is also essential in the theory of conversational implicature. It was in 1957 that Grice presented a theory that was the basis of his theory that the author further elaborated in subsequent documents. The fundamental idea behind significance in Grice's study is to think about the intention of the speaker in determining what message the speaker is trying to communicate.
Another issue in Grice's argument is that it does not consider intuitive communication. For example, in Grice's example, there is no clear understanding of what Andy believes when he states that Bob is unfaithful towards his spouse. However, there are a lot of counterexamples of intuitive communication that are not explained by Grice's analysis.
The main argument of Grice's approach is that a speaker should intend to create an effect in people. However, this assumption is not in any way philosophically rigorous. Grice decides on the cutoff with respect to potential cognitive capacities of the interlocutor as well as the nature of communication.
The sentence-meaning explanation proposed by Grice doesn't seem very convincing, although it's a plausible explanation. Other researchers have created more in-depth explanations of meaning, however, they appear less plausible. Additionally, Grice views communication as a rational activity. The audience is able to reason by observing communication's purpose.
Aphra behn received the condemnation without the praise दण्ड की आज्ञा ex:. The correct meaning of condemnation in hindi is निंदा. (किसी व्यक्ति या वस्तु का) दोषकथन । बुराई का बर्णन । ऐसी बात का कहना जिससे किसी का दुर्गुण, दोष, तुच्छता.
Acquittal Condemnation शब्द का वाक्य में प्रयोग.
Condemnation = hi दोष लगाना. The act of condemning something or someone: The building was condemned by the inspector.
Condemnation शब्द के हिंदी अर्थ का उदाहरण:
Know condemnation meaning in hindi and translation in hindi. It is written as vikretā in roman. Condemnation meaning in hindi :
Pronouncing As Wrong Or Morally Culpable Synonyms:.
Condemnation is an english word that is translated in hindi and carries a lot more information on this page. Pronouncing as wrong or morally culpable; Condemnation meaning in hindi is निंदा and it can write in roman as ninda.
Self Condemnation Definition, Pronuniation, Antonyms, Synonyms And Example Sentences In Hindi.
Condemnation (noun) = an expression of strong disapproval; Condemnation = निंदा (ninda) निंदा संज्ञा स्त्री॰ [सं॰ निन्दा] १. (किसी व्यक्ति या वस्तु का) दोषकथन । बुराई का बर्णन । ऐसी बात का कहना जिससे किसी का दुर्गुण, दोष, तुच्छता.
Condemnation Word Meaning With Their Sentences, Usage, Synonyms, Antonyms, Narrower Meaning And Related Word Meaning
There are always several meanings of each word in hindi. This page also provides synonyms. The correct meaning of condemnation in hindi is निंदा.
Post a Comment for "Meaning Of Condemnation In Hindi"